Personnel Management and Human Resource Management the Changing Dynamics

Personnel Management and Definition of Human Resource Management
Personnel Management (PM) in the UK has evolved over many years can be traced back to the Factory Acts of 1840’s a period when Capitalists with insight such as Rowntree and Cadbury motivated by religious convictions strived to improve the conditions and lives of the workers (Henderson, 2011). It was much later in the 1970’s that (PM) and sometimes called Personnel Administration (PA) was reinforced.

Human Resource Management (HRM) is defined as “is concerned with the employment, development and reward of people in organisations and the conduct of relationships between management and the workforce’. Armstrong (1999, p.3).

Comparative Analysis

An interesting comparison however makes it much more difficult to comprehend the difference as illustrated below.



Personnel Management (PM)
Human Resource Management (HRM)
Strategic Nature

Specifically Day to Day related /Adhoc Reactive, Short term


none strategic
Dealing with Day to day issues proactive nature integrated with other Mgt. functions

Long term strategic
Contract

Compliance from the employee
Based on seeking willingness of the commitment by employee
Job Design

Typically, scientific Mgt based
Typically, team based
Training and Development

Limited and usually restricted
to training non-managerial
employees

Narrowly job-related
Transformed into a learning
and development philosophy, job-related training

All employees including management is trained
Staff Welfare

Limited left to the last consideration
No explicit welfare role
Remuneration

Collective based Rate
Pay for position
Market Based
Pay for contribution

Pay for performance individual or Group
Recruitment

Sophisticated recruitment
practices for senior staff only

Strong reliance on external
local labour market for most
recruitment
Sophisticated Recruitment for all staff

Strong internal labour market for
core employees

Greater reliance
on external labour market for
non-core
Organisation Structure

Hierarchical /Vertical Integrations 
Flexible, Core Teams, High degree of outsourcing

adapted and developed from Guest (1987)

The comparison shows major area of differences for instance in nature of strategy and long-term orientation, more team based, flexibility, all employees including management is trained, Recruitment and Pay systems have changed particularly in the practice of Human Resource Management.  Armstrong (2006) suggest that the term Personnel Management has been largely replace by the term Human Resource Management.

Closing remarks
Other major changes in HRM is the adaptation of HPWP’s, Talent Management, Shift of HRM roles to front line managers are some of the major changes that has made HRM/D more strategic and Business goals oriented than (PM) HRM managers also perform specialist roles and work as Service providers and Business Partners in the contemporary workforce.


References
Armstrong, M.,  (1999) A handbook of human resources management practice. Kogan Page UK

Armstrong, M., (2006) A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 10th Edition, Kogan Page UK.

Henderson, I., (2011) Human Resource Management for MBA Students 2nd Edition. Published by CIPD

Guest (1987) Comparison Personnel Management and HRM management


Comments

  1. Well written essay good structure and the comparison chart is a good idea. Excellent referencing. The comparison chart of PM and HRM has a blank column could you kindly delete that additional blank column

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good start doctor.you have created it very nicely.good referencing.keep it up

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Practice of Strategic Human Resources Management in Contemporary Organisations

Impact of organizational culture in contemporary context