Personnel Management and Human Resource Management the Changing Dynamics
Personnel
Management and Definition of Human Resource Management
Personnel Management (PM) in the UK
has evolved over many years can be traced back to the Factory Acts of 1840’s a period
when Capitalists with insight such as Rowntree and Cadbury motivated by
religious convictions strived to improve the conditions and lives of the
workers (Henderson, 2011). It was much later in the 1970’s that (PM) and
sometimes called Personnel Administration (PA) was reinforced.
Human Resource Management (HRM) is
defined as “is concerned with the employment, development and reward of people
in organisations and the conduct of relationships between management and the
workforce’. Armstrong (1999, p.3).
Comparative Analysis
An interesting comparison however
makes it much more difficult to comprehend the difference as illustrated below.
|
|
|
Personnel Management (PM)
|
Human Resource Management (HRM)
|
|
Strategic Nature
|
|
Specifically Day to Day related /Adhoc Reactive,
Short term
none strategic
|
Dealing with Day to day issues proactive
nature integrated with other Mgt. functions
Long term strategic
|
|
Contract
|
|
Compliance from the employee
|
Based on seeking willingness of the
commitment by employee
|
|
Job Design
|
|
Typically, scientific Mgt based
|
Typically, team based
|
|
Training and Development
|
|
Limited
and usually restricted
to
training non-managerial
employees
Narrowly job-related
|
Transformed
into a learning
and
development philosophy, job-related training
All employees including management is
trained
|
|
Staff Welfare
|
|
Limited left to the last consideration
|
No explicit welfare role
|
|
Remuneration
|
|
Collective based Rate
Pay for position
|
Market Based
Pay for contribution
Pay for performance individual or Group
|
|
Recruitment
|
|
Sophisticated recruitment
practices for senior staff only
Strong reliance on external
local labour market for most
recruitment
|
Sophisticated Recruitment for all staff
Strong
internal labour market for
core employees
Greater
reliance
on
external labour market for
non-core
|
|
Organisation Structure
|
|
Hierarchical /Vertical Integrations
|
Flexible, Core Teams, High degree of
outsourcing
|
adapted and developed from Guest (1987)
The comparison shows major area of
differences for instance in nature of strategy and long-term orientation, more
team based, flexibility, all employees including management is trained,
Recruitment and Pay systems have changed particularly in the practice of Human
Resource Management. Armstrong (2006)
suggest that the term Personnel Management has been largely replace by the term
Human Resource Management.
Closing remarks
Other major changes in HRM is the
adaptation of HPWP’s, Talent Management, Shift of HRM roles to front line
managers are some of the major changes that has made HRM/D more strategic and
Business goals oriented than (PM) HRM managers also perform specialist roles
and work as Service providers and Business Partners in the contemporary
workforce.
References
Armstrong, M., (1999) A handbook of
human resources management practice. Kogan Page UK
Armstrong, M., (2006)
A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 10th Edition,
Kogan Page UK.
Henderson, I., (2011) Human Resource Management
for MBA Students 2nd Edition. Published by CIPD

Well written article keep it up
ReplyDeleteWell written essay good structure and the comparison chart is a good idea. Excellent referencing. The comparison chart of PM and HRM has a blank column could you kindly delete that additional blank column
ReplyDeleteGood start doctor.you have created it very nicely.good referencing.keep it up
ReplyDelete